O sucesso conjunto da identidade
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15658/rev.electron.educ.pedagog18.03020210Palavras-chave:
atividades múltiplas; aprendizagem; identidade; perspectiva situacionalResumo
A identidade tem se tornado em um conceito central na análise da aprendizagem desde as perspectivas sociais. Neste artigo, se descreve uma perspectiva situacional para conceptualizar a identidade como um sucesso conjunto entre os indivíduos e suas interações com as normas, praticas, ferramentas culturais, relações e contextos institucionais e culturais. Partindo de experiências de nossa prévia investigação, examinamos o sucesso conjunto da identidade com respeito a diferentes níveis de atividades, incluindo como a identidade se desenvolve em relação com a realização de uma atividade particular, e como comunidades e praticas mais duradouras estruturam as formas em que a identidade se desenvolve dentro e através das atividades. Ilustramos, em particular, como uma perspectiva situacional sobre a identidade lhe possibilita aos pesquisadores capturar a dinâmica interação dos indivíduos e os recursos, explicando assim os aspectos de estrutura e ação em todas as interações sociais.
Downloads
Referências
Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and moti- vation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260–267.
Anderman, E. M., Eccles, J. S., Yoon, K. S., Roeser, R., Wigfield, A., & Blumenfeld, P. (2001). Learning to value mathematics and reading: Relations to mastery and performance-oriented instructional practices. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(1), 76–95.
Barron, B. (2010). Conceptualizing and tracing learning pathways over time and setting. NSSE Yearbook,109, 113–127.
Barton, A. C., & Tan, E. (2010). We be burnin’! Agency, identity, and science learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19, 187–229.
Bateson, G. (1972). A theory of play and fantasy. In G. Bateson (Ed.), Steps to an ecology of mind: A revolutio- nary approach to man’s understanding of himself (pp. 177–193). New York, NY: Ballantine.
Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women’s ways of knowing: The deve- lopment of self, voice, and mind. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Bell, P., Tzou, C., Bricker, L., & Baines, A. (2012). Learning in diversities of structures of social practice: Ac- counting for how, why and where people learn science. Human Development, 55, 269–284.
Boaler, J., & Greeno, J. G. (2000). Identity, agency, and knowing in mathematics worlds. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 171–200). Westport, CT: Ablex.
Boaler, J., & Staples, M. (2008). Creating mathematical futures through an equitable teaching approach: The case of railside school. Teachers College Record, 110, 608–645.
Burke, K. (1941). The philosophy of literary form: Studies in symbolic action. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
Calabrese, A. B., Kang, H., Tan, E., O’Neill, T., Bautista-Guerra, J., & Brecklin, C. (2013). Crafting a future in science: Tracing middle school girls’ identity work over time and Space. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 37–75.
Carlone, H. B., Haun-Frank, J., & Webb, A. (2011). Assessing equity beyond knowledge—and skills-ba- sed outcomes: A comparative ethnography of two fourth-grade reform-based science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 459–485.
Cobb, P., Gresalfi, M., & Hodge, L. L. (2009). An interpretive scheme for analyzing the identities that students develop in mathematics classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(1), 40–68.
Cohen, E. G.,& Lotan, R. A. (1997). Working forequity in heterogeneous classrooms. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Dreier, O. (1999). Personal trajectories of participation across context of social practice. Outlines, 4, 5–31.
Eccles, J., Wigfield, A., Harold, R. D., & Blumenfeld, P. (1993). Age and gender differences in children’s self-
and task perceptions during elementary school. Child Development, 64, 830–847.
Engle, R., Lam, D., Meyer, X., & Nix, S. (2012). How does expansive framing promote transfer? Several propo- sed explanations and a research agenda for investigating them. Educational Psychologist, 47, 215–231.
Engle, R. A. (2006). Framing interactions to foster generative learning: A situative explanation of transfer in a community of learners classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 451–498.
Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 399–483.
Erickson, F. (1985). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. Palo Alto, CA: Institute for Research on Teaching.
Erickson, F. (1987). Transformation and school success: The politics and culture of educational achievement. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 18, 335–356.
Esmonde, I. (2009). Mathematics learning in groups: Analysing equity in two cooperative activity structu- res. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18, 247–284.
Esmonde, I., & Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2010). Power in numbers: Student participation in mathematical dis- cussions in heterogeneous spaces. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41, 288–315.
Furtak, E. M. (2006). The problem with answers: An exploration of guided scientific inquiry teaching. Science Education, 90, 453–467.
Gee, J. P. (2000). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Reviewof Research in Education, 25, 99–125.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Greeno, J. (2009). A theory bite on contextualizing, framing, and positioning: A companion to son and
goldstone. Cognition and Instruction, 27, 269–275.
Greeno, J., & Gresalfi, M. (2008). Opportunities to learn in practice and identity. In P. Moss, D. Pullin, J. P. Gee,
E. Haertel, & J. Young (Eds.), Assessment, equity, and opportunity to learn (pp. 170–199). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Greeno, J. G., & MMAP. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53, 5–26.
Gresalfi, M. (2004). Taking up opportunities to learn: Examining the construction of participatory mathematical identities in middle school students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Gresalfi, M. (2009). Taking up opportunities to learn: Constructing dispositions in mathematics classrooms. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18, 327–369.
Gresalfi, M. S., Barnes, J., & Cross, D. (2012). When does an opportunity become an opportunity? Unpac- king classroom practice through the lens of ecological psychology. Educational Studies inMathe- matics, 80, 249–267.
Gresalfi, M. S., & Cobb, P. (2011). Negotiating identities for mathematics teaching in the context of profes- sional development. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42, 270–304.
Gresalfi, M., Martin, T., Hand, V., & Greeno, J. G. (2008). Constructing competence: An analysis of student partici- pation in the activity systems of mathematics classrooms. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70, 49–70.
Gutierrez, K., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19–25.
Gutierrez, K., & Vossoughi, S. (2010). Lifting off the ground to return anew: Mediated praxis, transformative learning, and social design experiments. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 100–117.
Hand, V. (2003). Reframing participation: Meaningful mathematical activity in diverse classrooms (Unpu- blished doctoral dissertation). Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Hand, V. (2010). The co-construction of opposition within a low-track mathematics classroom. AmericanEducational Research Journal, 47, 97–132.
Hand, V. (2012). Seeing power and culture in mathematics learning: Teacher noticing for equitable mathematics instruction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80, 233–247
Hand, V. (2014). “Taking up our space”: Becoming competent learners in the mathematics classroom. In N. Nasir,
N. Louie, C. Cabana, B. Shreve, & E. Woodbury (Eds.), Mathematics for equity: A framework for successful practice (pp. 91–106). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Hand, V., Penuel, W., & Guti_errez, K. (2012). (Re)Framing educational possibility: Attending to power and equity in shaping access to and within learning opportunities. Human Development, 55, 250– 268.
Harre, R., & van Langenhove, L. (1999). Positioning theory: Moralcontextsofintentionalaction. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Herrenkohl, L. R., & Guerra, M. R. (1998). Participant structures, scientific discourse and student enga-
gement in fourth grade. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 431–473.
Holland, D., & Lachicotte, W. (2007). Vygotsky, Mead, and the new sociocultural studies of identity. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 101–135). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Horn, I. S. (2007). Fast kids, slow kids, lazy kids: Modeling the mismatch problem in math teachers’ conver- sations. Journal of Learning Sciences, 16, 37–79.
Jimenez-Aleixandre, M., Rodr_ıquez, A., & Duschl, R. (2000). “Doing the lesson” or “doing science”: Argu- ment in high school genetics. Science Education, 84, 757–792.
Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2011). How Brianna became bossy and Kofi came out smart: Understanding the trajectories of identity and engagement for two group leaders in a project-based mathematics classroom. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 11, 207– 225. doi:1 0.1080/14926156.2011.595881
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning and legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cam- bridge University Press.
Leander, K. M. (2001). “This is our freedom bus going home right now”: Producing and hybridizing space-ti- me contexts in pedagogical discourse. Journal of Literacy Research, 33, 637–679.
Leander, K. M., Phillips, N. C., & Taylor, K. H. (2010). The changing social spaces of learning: Mapping new mobilities. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 329–394.
Lee, C. D. (2001). Is october brown chinese? A cultural modeling activity system for underachieving stu- dents. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 97–141.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Secção
Licença
Uma vez que o artigo seja aceito pela Revista Eletrônica de Educação e Pedagogia, os autores atribuem os direitos de publicar e distribuir o texto eletronicamente, bem como arquiválo e tornálo acessível on-line.
Os autores podem distribuir seu próprio material sem solicitar permissão ao periódico, desde que seja mencionado que a versão original pode ser encontrada em https://revedupe.unicesmag.edu.co/index.php/EDUPE/issue/archive
Todos os conteúdos da Revista Eletrônica de Educação e Pedagogia são publicados sob a licença internacional Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 e podem ser usados gratuitamente, dando os créditos aos autores e à Revista, conforme estabelecido nesta licença.
.jpg)
1_(1).png)
.jpg)
