A abordagem mosaica, direito à participação e a voz das crianças na pesquisa educativa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15658/rev.electron.educ.pedagog20.05040608Palavras-chave:
Infância; abordagem de direitos; abordagem em mosaico; pesquisa qualitativa; participação infantilResumo
O artigo de revisão propõe explorar e discutir algumas das inovações metodológicas no campo da infância e a educação, enfocando-se na abordagem do mosaico. Trata-se de uma aproximação metodológica - ainda não constituída como método -, desenvolvida principalmente no idioma inglês e que baseia alguns de seus princípios em conceitos como os da pesquisa qualitativa, o estudo da infância, os direitos das crianças e, em particular, o direito de participar de pesquisas realizadas sobre eles e seu mundo. Se apresenta um quadro histórico que ajuda a entender as origens multidisciplinares da abordagem. Por meio de uma revisão de literatura em uma base de dados que contém 71 milhões de referências, 28 foram selecionados que identificam a abordagem do mosaico em seu método. Sua análise apresenta um panorama diversificado em seu uso, embora seja focado principalmente na área de educação infantil e pré-escola. Foi concluído com uma reflexão sobre o uso que a abordagem pode ter no futuro e, em particular, na América Latina, onde seu uso incipiente parece relevante.
Downloads
Referências
Akyol; T. & Erkan; S. (2018). The effect of mosaic based approach on involvement levels of children. International Journal of Educational Methodology; 4(4); 303–309. doi:10.12973/ijem.4.4.303
Alderson; P. & Morrow; V. (2011). The ethics of research with children and young people: A practical handbook. London: SAGE Publications.
Altheide; D. & Johnson; J. (2011). Reflections on interpretive adequacy in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin; & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.); The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.) (pp. 581–594). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Aveyard; H. (2014). Doing a literature review in health and social care. A practical guide (Third edition). London: Open University Press.
Baird; K. (March; 2013). Exploring a methodology with young children: Reflections on using the Mosaic and Ecocultural approaches. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood; 38(1); 35-40.
Bernard van Leer Foundation. (2016). Urban95 Archives. Recuperado de https://bernardvanleer.org/es/solutions/urban95-es/
Blundell; D. (2011). Education and constructions of childhood. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Botsoglou; K.; Beazidou; E.; Kougioumtzidou; E. & Vlachou; M. (2019). Listening to children: Using the ECERS-R and Mosaic approach to improve learning environments: A case study. Early Child Development and Care; 189(4); 635–649. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2017.1337006
Bradway; T. & McCallum; E. L. (Eds.). (2019). After queer studies: Literature; theory and sexuality in 21st century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brooker; L. (2008). Supporting transitions in the early years. New York: Open University Press.
Clark; A.; Bureau; N. C. & Moss; P. (2005). Spaces to play: More listening to young children using the Mosaic approach. Recuperado de http://capitadiscovery.co.uk/derby-ac/items/866211
Clark; A.; Flewitt; R.; Hammersley; M. & Robb; M. (2013). Understanding research with children and young people (First edition). Los Angeles; California: SAGE Publications.
Clark; A. & Moss; P. (2017). Listening to young children: A guide to understanding and using the mosaic approach. Recuperado de http://derby.ebookcentral.proquest.com/patron/fullrecord.aspx?P=4784949
Clark; A.; Moss; P. & Bureau; N. C. (2011). Listening to young children: The mosaic approach (2nd ed.). Recuperado de http://ezproxy.derby.ac.uk/login?Url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/abstractview/S9781907969423
Clarke; A. E. (2012). Feminism; grounded theory; and situational analysis revisited. In S. N. Hesse-Biber (Ed.); Handbook of Feminist Research: Theory and Praxis (pp. 388–412). doi: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483384740.n18
Cohen; B.; Moss; P.; Petrie; P. & Wallace; J. (2018). ‘A new deal for children?’ – what happened next: A cross-national study of transferring early childhood services into education. Early Years: An International Journal of Research and Development. doi: Https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2018.1504753
Consejo para la Cultura y las Artes (CONARTE). (27 de septiembre de 2019). Niños exploran en la muestra Mosaico de trazos; palabras; materiales [Mensaje en un blog]. Recuperado de http://conarte.org.mx/2019/09/27/ninos-exploran-en-la-muestra-mosaico-de-trazos-palabras-materiales/
Corsaro; W. & Eder; D. (January-December; 1990). Children’s Peer Cultures. Annual Review of Sociology; 16(1); 197-220. doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.16.080190.001213
Corsaro; W. A. (2018). The sociology of childhood (Fifth edition). Thousand Oaks; CA: SAGE publication Ltd.
Dahlberg; G. & Moss; P. (2005). Ethics and politics in early childhood education. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Dahlberg; G.; Moss; P. & Pence; A. (2007). Beyond quality in early childhood education and care: Languages of evaluation. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
De Azevedo; L. N. (2012). Including young people in heritage conservation in southern brazilian cities: The case of pelotas. In P. Kraftl; J. Horton; & F. Tucker (Eds.)
Critical geographies of childhood and youth: Contemporary policy and practice. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781847428462.003.0011
De Beco; G. (2010). Right to education indicators based on the 4 As—Concept Paper. Recuperado de https://www.right-to-education.org/resource/right-education-indicators-based-4-concept-paper
Delgado-Fuentes; M. A.; González Peral; A. & Martínez Valle; C. (2015). La transición del preescolar a la escuela primaria ¿Cómo aprenden los niños a leer el contexto escolar? En N. Del Río Lugo (Ed.); Primera infancia en el espacio público: experiencias latinoamericanas (pp. 108–122). Recuperado de https://programainfancia.uam.mx/publicaciones/primera_infancia.html
Denzin; N. K. (December; 2016). Critical Qualitative Inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry; 23(1); 8–16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800416681864
Denzin; N. K. & Lincoln; Y. S. (Eds.). (2005). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (Third edition). Thousand Oaks; CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Denzin; N. K. & Lincoln; Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (Fourth edition). Thousand Oaks; CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Denzin; N. K. & Lincoln; Y. S. (Eds.). (2017). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (Fifth edition.). Thousand Oaks; CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Doise; W. & Mugny; G. (1984). The social development of the intellect. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-11024-3
Ellingson; L. (2009). Engaging crystallization in qualitative research: An introduction. doi: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412991476
Ellingson; L. (2011). Analysis and representation across the continuum. In N. Denzin; & Y. Lincoln; (Eds.); The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th edition.) (pp. 595–610). Thousand Oaks; CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Equipo del proyecto “niños; niñas y jóvenes constructores-as de paz”. (2017). “Niños; Niñas y Jóvenes Constructores de Paz”; una propuesta para fortalecer subjetividades políticas y generar procesos de construcción de Paz. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales; Niñez y Juventud; 15(2); 1390–1396.
Fritz-Macías; H. (2016a). El proceso de amistad en la cultura de pares en el preescolar :un estudio de caso donde los niños son co-investigadores. México; DF: Universidad Iberoamericana.
Fritz-Macías; H. (mayo; 2016b). Niños de preescolar participando en la investigación educativa mediante el enfoque mosaico. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación; 71; 197–216. doi: https://doi.org/10.35362/rie71011
George; R.; Howitt; C. & Oakley; G. (2019). Young children’s use of an augmented reality sandbox to enhance spatial thinking. Children’s Geographies; 18(2); 209-221. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2019.1614533
Greenfield; C. (2011). Personal reflection on research process and tools: Effectiveness; highlights and challenges in using the mosaic approach. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood; 3. doi: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/183693911103600314
Guba; E. G. & Lincoln; Y. S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies; contradictions; and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.); The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.) (pp. 191–215). Thousand Oaks; CA: Sage Publications Ltd.
Hesse-Biber; S. (2012). Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis. doi: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483384740
Hreinsdottir; A. & Davidsdottir; S. (2011). Deliberative democratic evaluation in preschools. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research; 56(5); 519–537. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2011.599426
James; J. (March; 2016). Children as service users of a children’s centre. Community Practitioner; 89(3); 42–48. Recuperado de https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27111978
James; A. & Prout; A. (2014). Constructing and reconstructing childhood : contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood (Third edition). London: Routledge.
Jesson; J.; Matheson; L. & Lacey; F. (2011). Doing your literature review : traditional and systematic techniques. Thousand Oaks; CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Kincheloe; J. & McLaren; P. (2005). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In K. Hayes; S. Steinberg; K. Tobin (Eds.); The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.) (pp. 303–342). Thousand Oaks; CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Kingston; K. (September; 2016). Development of a child evaluation framework for early childhood services using deliberative democratic evaluation and the mosaic approach. Evaluation Journal of Australasia; 16(3); 25-34.
Kinney; L. & Wharton; P. (2015). An encounter with Reggio Emilia: Children and adults in transformation (Second edition). London: Routledge.
Koçyi̇ği̇t; S. (September; 2014). Preschool age children’s views about Primary School. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice; 14(5); 1870–1874. doi: https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2014.5.2393
Ladson-Billings; G. & Donnor; J. (2005). The moral activist role of critical race theory scholarship. In Denzin & Lincoln (Eds.); The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.) (pp. 279–301). Thousand Oaks; CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Lane; D. Blank; J. & Jones; P. (April 1; 2019;). Research with children: Context; power; and representation [Messaje on The Qualitative Report Website]. Recuperado de https://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A588342525/AONE?Sid=lms
Lincoln; Y. S. & Denzin; N. K. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks; California: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Madison; D. S. (2011). Critical ethnography: Method; ethics; and performance (Second edition). Thousand Oaks; California: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Martínez-Preciado; J. F. (2019). Agency and rights in childhood (México). Recuperado de http://www.becs.bloomsbury.com/becs/article
McCormick; K. I. (2018). Mosaic of care: Preschool children’s caring expressions and enactments. Journal of Early Childhood Research; 16(4); 378–392. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X18809388
Mercieca; D. & Mercieca; D. P. (March; 2014). Eps becoming ignorant: Questioning the assumption of listening and empowerment in young children. Educational & Child Psychology; 31(1); 22–31.
Merewether; J. & Fleet; A. (2014). Seeking children’s perspectives: A respectful layered research approach. Early Child Development and Care; 184(6); 897–914. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2013.829821
Moore; D. (2015). The teacher doesn’t know what it is; but she knows where we are: Young children’s secret places in early childhood outdoor environments. International Journal of Play; 4(1); 20–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/21594937.2014.925292
Oficina del Alto Comisionado de las Naciones Unidas para los Derechos Humanos (ACNUDH). (1989). Convención sobre los Derechos del Niño. Recuperado de https://www.ohchr.org/sp/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx
Orman; T. F. (January-December; 2017). Bulgarian playgrounds in transition: Do children’s and parents’ perceptions differ? Corvinus Journal of Sociology and Social Policy; 8(1); 71–94. doi: https://doi.org/10.14267/CJSSP.2017.01.04
Quarmby; T. (April; 2014). Sport and physical activity in the lives of looked-after children: A ‘hidden group’ in research; policy and practice. Sport; Education & Society; 19(7); 944–958.
Randall; D. (January; 2012). Children’s regard for nurses and nursing: A mosaic of children’s views on community nursing. Journal of Child Health Care; 16(1); 91–104. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1367493511426279
Rayna; S. & Garnier; P. (July; 2018). Toddlers taking pictures of their preschool life: Towards a reflexive approach of qualitative research with young children. Early Years: An International Journal of Research and Development. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2018.1493049
Rouvali; A. & Riga; V. (2019). Redefining the importance of children’s voices in personal social emotional development curriculum using the Mosaic Approach. Education 3-13; 47(8); 998–1013. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2018.1553990
Salinas-Quiroz. (2019). Sexuality and sexualization in childhood (México). Bloomsbury Education and Childhhod. doi: https://doi.org/DOI: 10.5040/9781474209472.0013
Shala; R. F. (2015). The “Mosaic” Approach; a working alternative in the Public Preschool Institutions in Kosovo. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences; 6(5); 21-30. Recuperado de https://www.mcser.org/journal/index.php/mjss/article/view/7531
Vecchi; V. (2010). Art and creativity in Reggio Emilia: Exploring the role and potential of ateliers in early childhood education. New York: Routledge.
Xu; J.; Wang; P.; Sturm; B. W. & Wu; Y. (2018). How preschool children think about libraries: Evidence from six children’s libraries in China. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science; 52(2); 428-440. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000618818887
Yilmaz; S. (August; 2016). The importance of listenning the voices of children from their immediate outdoor environments of their early childhood centers. Okul öncesi eğitim kurumlarinin diş mekanlarinin çocuklari dinleyerek oluşturulmasinin önemi; 6(11); 187–207.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Secção
Licença
Uma vez que o artigo seja aceito pela Revista Eletrônica de Educação e Pedagogia, os autores atribuem os direitos de publicar e distribuir o texto eletronicamente, bem como arquiválo e tornálo acessível on-line.
Os autores podem distribuir seu próprio material sem solicitar permissão ao periódico, desde que seja mencionado que a versão original pode ser encontrada em https://revedupe.unicesmag.edu.co/index.php/EDUPE/issue/archive
Todos os conteúdos da Revista Eletrônica de Educação e Pedagogia são publicados sob a licença internacional Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 e podem ser usados gratuitamente, dando os créditos aos autores e à Revista, conforme estabelecido nesta licença.
.jpg)
1_(1).png)
.jpg)
